No 3.2 For iPhone And iPod Touch

Discussion in 'iPod touch Firmware 4.0 Speculation' started by Puaar94, Jan 29, 2010.

  1. xXrkidXx Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Message Count:
    4,615
    Device:
    iPhone 5 (Black)
    It somewhat is.. If you try the touchsmart PC from HP, the buttons really arent that tiny. And Im sure they could you kno, maybe ENLARGE the buttons a little in OS X? Because I do see how that would become a problem with touch.

    EDIT

    If it had USB,and a bootloader, we could actually give a go at getting OS X on this.. We would just need some mod book kexts, and an external hardrive(So you dont completely make it unusable as an iPod/iPad.
  2. nickswitz New Member

    Member Since:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Message Count:
    637
    Device:
    3G iPod touch
    The HP Touchsmart stinks, It's slow and very unresponsive.
  3. iPwn Community Development Team

    Member Since:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Message Count:
    7,115
    Device:
    Nexus 4
    does osx support ARM processors? ik some dude virtualized win7 on it
  4. tinyman392 Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Message Count:
    13,548
    Device:
    5G iPod touch
    OS X does NOT support ARM. Its an x86 (Intel) processor or G4 (Leopard and older, NOT Snow Leopard).
  5. iPwn Community Development Team

    Member Since:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Message Count:
    7,115
    Device:
    Nexus 4
    But AMDs work though Hackintosh, so in theory, you could make it run on an ARM.
  6. Terminal59 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Message Count:
    36
    Device:
    2G iPod touch
    think about it everyone if you have some of these features then what for 4.0 barely anything llol
  7. blixter New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Message Count:
    7
    hmmm the beta 5 shows some indication that it support iphone and ipod....
  8. Gatorsxrule New Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 24, 2009
    Message Count:
    277
    Device:
    3G iPod touch
    How? Or are you not allowed to say cuase of NDA
  9. _JKK_ Front Page Reporter

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Message Count:
    8,783
    Device:
    Nexus 4
    Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but AMD isn't ARM.

    So your point is null and void.
  10. theapplecorner New Member

    Member Since:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Message Count:
    2
    Device:
    2G iPod touch
    Doubt It

    Apple just acknowledging that its 3.2 is enough. and why would they get dev. 3.2 beta not 3.2. cuz most probably once the ipad is available the iphone os 3.2 will be available. but might cost 10$ like the big switch from 2.1.1 to 3.0 in summer..