Discussion in 'Console & PC Gaming' started by ihax_ipt, Mar 8, 2010.
Well? Which do you prefer?
Vote! : )
BC2 ftw. Physics over just simple run and gun, well technically camp and gun, anyday.
Yeah, I agree. It really is just much more life-like overall.
The non-realistic visual style of BC2 is what put me off. The guns seemed kiddy in look to me, as compared to MW2. I guess if I hadn't ever played or seen or heard of MW2, I'd like BC2 more. So I'm more for MW2. Though I wish they could combine somehow.
MW2's gameplay, class customization & perks mixed with BC2's Private servers, Mods, physics (destructible buildings), and Vehicles.
I pick CoD: WaW. =D
If I had to pick from this, MW2 has to get this one. =P
I like MW2 more. More professional. BC feels to run-of-the-mill
Bad Company 2 by a long mile. Far outclasses Modern Warfare's multiplayer, which is almost entirely skill-less and aims for the lowest common denominator (and is broken to boot), in pretty much every regard. Modern Warfare = Good fun, Bad Company 2 = superior competitive and challenging gameplay.
I just like WaW because it was based on WWII and Treyarch made it. I also like the zombie mode and the campaign (story). I played the story mode about 5-6 times now (unless you are talking about mission select then I played it more) and I played Zombie mode so much that I don't even keep track anymore. Meh, WaW looks more professional and it looks way more realistic. All is well, I still like MW2 a lot as well, but my game of choice is WaW. Anyway, I agree with what I made in bold.
Speaking of treyarch they are making CoD (7).
But BFBC2 Wins my heart... (well in a sense) I have been a HUGE fan of the Battlefield games (well not Modern combat 2). MW2 sucked imo.
Finally someone who thinks the same as me. It sucks to meh, I just play it since my uncle has no better games. I would go MW2 over BFBC2 though because BFBC2 sucks more.
Separate names with a comma.