Apple to Samsung in 2010: Let's License

Discussion in 'Front Page News' started by News Bot, Aug 10, 2012.

Page 1 of 2

  1. News Bot iFans.com News

    Member Since:
    Sep 14, 2007
    Message Count:
    6,419
    News Bot, Aug 10, 2012
    #1

  2. _JKK_ Front Page Reporter

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Message Count:
    8,783
    Device:
    Nexus 4
    Unless I'm completely stupid (somewhat likely), counter-plaintiff is Samsung in this case. They aren't technically a defendant, even though they are certainly on the defense right now as Apple wraps up its case.
    _JKK_, Aug 10, 2012
    #2
    TechFitGJ likes this.

  3. XxRedRumxX Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 18, 2009
    Message Count:
    5,926
    Device:
    Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    Someone must not have done their homework.
    XxRedRumxX, Aug 10, 2012
    #3

  4. Zyiros Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    12,005
    Device:
    Nexus 4
    Samsung's Brainzzzz were eaten by the zombieezzz.

    Jeeeeeezzzzz.
    Zyiros, Aug 10, 2012
    #4
    Ubeans2001 likes this.

  5. morto Active Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 14, 2010
    Message Count:
    247
    Device:
    5G iPod touch
    Advertising has us chasing cars and clothes, working jobs we hate so we can buy sh*t we don't need.

    Tyler Durden

    morto, Aug 11, 2012
    #5
    TechFitGJ likes this.

  6. trash1000 Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jul 14, 2009
    Message Count:
    392
    Device:
    iPhone 4S (Black)
    Hm... this doesn't actually prove Samsung was copying Apple back then. It just proves that Apple a) accused Samsung of copying and b) wanted to settle their problem with Samsung with license fees.
    trash1000, Aug 11, 2012
    #6

  7. blunden Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 7, 2008
    Message Count:
    501
    Device:
    iPod touch
    True. The article here also doesn't mention that Apple refused to take a license for the 3G patents they should have for every iPhone before the 4S.
    blunden, Aug 11, 2012
    #7

  8. _JKK_ Front Page Reporter

    Member Since:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Message Count:
    8,783
    Device:
    Nexus 4
    Their argument for that is that the part they purchased came from a manufacturer who already licensed the patent from Samsung, and, since they are only buying a finished product and not actually creating it themselves, they do not infringe upon it.
    _JKK_, Aug 11, 2012
    #8
    Apochalypze likes this.

  9. jasonApple iFans Cinema Producer

    Member Since:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Message Count:
    1,595
    Device:
    iPhone 4 (Black)
    That picture is not of an iPhone 4:p
    jasonApple, Aug 11, 2012
    #9

  10. qiren_94 Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jun 14, 2011
    Message Count:
    140
    Device:
    iPhone 5 (Black)
    One does not simply get an iPhone 3G/3GS mixed upped with an iPhone 4.
    qiren_94, Aug 12, 2012
    #10
Page 1 of 2