Android Quadrant Benchmark Scores

Discussion in 'Android Chat' started by qaiz, Oct 16, 2010.

  1. qaiz Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Message Count:
    1,772
    Device:
    iPhone 4 (White)
    So I thought I would make a thread discussing quadrant benchmark scores on your Android devices and maybe compare them with each other. This is a Apple based site but I know many of you guys have Android devices :D

    As you know, android devices are very powerful these days and with the tons of hacks and Roms available for them, they get even better with age!

    I would love to see all your scores! :D

    Heres my Benchmark scores from my Samsung Galaxy S-I9000

    [IMG]

    Pretty nice huh? :)
  2. procharged Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    88
    Device:
    iPhone 4 (Black)
    Ya ..I have the captivate and while the ext2 lag fix does help a little the voodoo version is better. The quadrant score is a little lower and you don't lose any storage space since it converts the whole filesystem from from rfs to ext4 without using a buffer to take up space. Even faster than both of them is the leaked froyo build that I'm using. It flies.
  3. ipodtouch1234 Active Member

    Member Since:
    Oct 21, 2007
    Message Count:
    1,353
    Device:
    iPad 2 (Black)
    My US Cellular HTC Desire with a cyanogen mod nightly gets about 1500.
  4. jimbeam Active Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,872
    Device:
    iPhone 3G (Black)
    Old one. Samsung vibrant using JAKs OC/UV 1.2GHz kernel with RyanZA's lagfix. Recently switched to JAK's OC/UV kernel with Voodoo lagfix. The phone feels like its running a bit better with voodoo rather then RyanZA lagfix, but quadrant actually shows a lower score with voodoo. :confused:

    [IMG]

    I get about 2000 with voodoo

    Tip: AdFree from the market ;)
  5. qaiz Active Member

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Message Count:
    1,772
    Device:
    iPhone 4 (White)
    Thats a very nice score indeed :)

    My Galaxy S is running a stock kernel with MCR LagFix

    ps, thanks for the tip :p
  6. procharged Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Message Count:
    88
    Device:
    iPhone 4 (Black)
    ya..i really prefer voodoo over one click lag fix. oclf uses ext2 and makes a buffer that takes up space which im not a huge fan of but it is fast. voodoo completely converts the filesystem from rfs to ext4 and you dont really lose any space since its not using a buffer. i also think voodoo is faster than oclf even with the lower quadrant scores
  7. jimbeam Active Member

    Member Since:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Message Count:
    3,872
    Device:
    iPhone 3G (Black)
    Found a good post on RFS lag a the different fixes. Looks like the lag is cause by a combination of RFS and the MoviNAND chip the galaxy s line uses. Voodoo replaces RFS with EXT4 which reduces real writes to MoviNAND. OCLF creates a loopback filesystem of EXT2 which again reduces real writes to MoviNAND. Basically the same as voodoo, but OCLF's loopback approach also speeds up Sqlite databases which most android apps use. It explains the higher quadrant scores using oclf.

    I'll still take voodoo over oclf for more space for apps, plus I noticed random freezes with oclf over time.
  8. mandi New Member

    Member Since:
    May 25, 2011
    Message Count:
    1
    SGS 1.3GHz oclf 2.3.1
    2433 quadrant score.
  9. eriksoto Member

    Member Since:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Message Count:
    50
    Device:
    3G iPod touch
    I'll post mine in a bit.

    There we go.[IMG]
  10. GazaIan Well-Known Member

    Member Since:
    May 19, 2010
    Message Count:
    5,834
    Device:
    iPad 2 (White)
    [IMG]

    You all lose ^_^