http://www.anandtech.com/show/5471/snapdragon-s4-krait-msm8960-gpu-benchmark-surfaces So... if the Mali gets 46.2 FPS at 800x480, it should only get 28.9 at 1024x600....compared to the Adreno 225's 54.9. And the 543MP2 is around twice as fast as the Mali? That would put the Adreno 225 at par with the SGX543MP2, and the A5 would be deeply lacking in CPU power compared to S4/Krait's 28nm A15 design.
Yawn...you done sucking my dick yet? Don't expect any replies from me ass hole, much rather play revelations then talk to an ass hat. I'm not even going to read your messages, so lol.
[IMG] I've got the game and let me say that the graphics are insane. YouTube or screen shots do no justice. The actual section that was in the demo looks even better and different in the finished game. I'm also playing in third person view and its amazing. Circle pad pro is amazing. So yeah...
and I love how your like "revelations only has extra effects, volumetric fog, extra basic shaders" lol your acting like its nothing impressive. b*tch these things make a game. Its appearance is changed like day and night. These aren't basic effects, these are mother f***ing effects we see from the ps3 and 360 and things we couldn't get last Gen at all. Just better textures? Just? That's a lot if difference, you even hinted that a vita version could have better textures (lol) so you obviously value textures so don't act like these effects can just be tacked on. These effects differentiate last Gen from this gen . These aspects are much more: important then say higher resolution with sharper textures, MSAA, more poly counts and 60 fps for instance. Especially in a 3.5 or even 5inch display. And no, vita couldn't run revelations with all that. Most vita games aren't even native Res, and have sh*tty textures and never mind 30fps in 2d. Dreamworld much ***/
Lastly, vita sucks c*ck. Even if its graphics were better then ps4, its like saying iPhone 6 is stronger, because just like iPhone, PS vita will have no games. No one will makes for it and it won't even exist in a year, so there's no point in talking about vita. Might as well talk about my dick.
The Vita is already compatible with most console middleware engines, it's GPU architecture is superior to the PS3...because the ps3 gpu is worse then my sh*t.
SM3L more demanding then galaxy, better animations, extra effects etc MK better then wii version, shaders, graphics, 60 fps in 3d etc Revelations better graphics then re4, extra effects, better textures and shaders. Better music sound quality, multiple voice overs, insane cut scenes,3d etc. Out first year of systems life cycle etc.
VT4 small tennis game with all resources on a single tennis court. And looks worse then ps3 version, check that box. FiFA haven't seen too much of it cos football is for fags, but again not ps3 quality, look at character models, crowd etc. 2048 looks really good, ps3 game scaled down, very nice looking game. olden Abyss looks just as sh*t as the already ugly Uncharted 1 LBP small scope, nothing interesting at all, check that box MvsC3 basically a static wallpaper with some people fighting in front of it. SFxT haven't seen it, no comment And then you list all the average 3ds games lol. Might as well list f1 as well while you at it.
Small tight corridors, less things to render on the environments, scarce enemies, enemies are not very responsive etc Oh wow! Lol Small tight corridors? Look at Chris redfields section of the game. I've got the demo and its rendering a lot of stuff, multiple different light sources, multiple character (Jill and Parker each with shadows etc) scarce enemies? Have you seen hell mode? Have you played the full game? More sections will open up you c*ck sucking ***. enemies are not very responsive? Played the game? I had no issues, the enemies react straight away, And...why the f*** am I explaining myself to a *** like you?